Monday, October 17, 2011
The Lullaby of Broadway ...
“The next great heresy is going to be simply an attack on morality, and especially on sexual morality... And the madness of tomorrow will come not from Moscow but from Manhattan.”
-G.K. Chesterton, 1926
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Genesis Debate, part 2
ME: So, when Scripture is read, should we wait for the lab results before saying the 'Amen'? Dave's point stands - if theology is subject to scientific consensus then what else is up for grabs? What stops us IN PRINCIPLE? Isn't it THE slippery slope that marks the point of departure, historically, from orthodoxy into liberalism?
A - love you, brother, but 'proven'? When scientists claim to have "proven" fossil aging in the billions of years in the same way that - say - they did the polio vaccine, a certain cynicism is in order. On the contrary, God's Word is sure. Its clear points are to be clearly and plainly believed.
@ Galileo - I asked for chapters - because that's what we have for creation. And their CLEAR point is 6-day creation, while the metaphorical "sun rising / setting" is incidental. There is no honest comparison.
@ Galileo - I asked for chapters - because that's what we have for creation. And their CLEAR point is 6-day creation, while the metaphorical "sun rising / setting" is incidental. There is no honest comparison.
A - hope to get together again soon, maybe in DC?
Pastor B, as 1 Peter commands, preach as the oracle of God, not the oracle of God**.
Let God be true and every man a liar [white lab coat notwithstanding].
HIM: B- you can still say the "Amen" whether the days are meant to be literal or figurative, because the message of Scripture is that GOD created the universe! The same way that 400 years ago, the congregation could say the "Amen" to the "...geocentric" verses before "the observatory results" were in, because the message is NOT geocentrism OR heliocentrism.
Labels:
apologetics,
evolution,
hermeneutics,
scientism,
theology
Saturday, October 8, 2011
It Gets Better …once you repent
There has been a lot of media coverage recently because of the suicides of some young students who had allegedly been the victims of bullying connected to their nascent homosxlity. Never before have we needed more clarity on this issue. Never before have we needed more honesty about this issue. But both are very hard to come by. What if it doesn’t get better? What if a life of sxl immorality is a meatgrinder that leaves people mangled, used, and desperately alone in the end? I hope we can have this discussion with honesty and love to our dear ones in the struggle.
Below is an abridged essay written by Ronald Lee who refers to himself as a former gay [of several decades] and now devout Christian [Catholic]. He has written bravely and frankly to set the record straight and this lengthy essay is well worth the read.
The Truth About the Homosxl Rights Movement
Ronald G. Lee
There was a "gay" bookstore called Lobo's in Austin, Texas, when I was living there. The layout was interesting. Looking inside from the street all you saw were books - like any other bookstore. It all looked so innocuous and disarmingly bourgeois. But if you went inside to browse, before long you noticed another section, behind the books, a section not visible from the street. The pornography section. Hundreds and hundreds of videos involving men catering to every conceivable sxl taste or fantasy. And you would notice something else too. All the customers were in the back, rooting through the videos. As far as I know, I am the only person who ever actually purchased a book. The books were, in every sense of the word, a front.
Below is an abridged essay written by Ronald Lee who refers to himself as a former gay [of several decades] and now devout Christian [Catholic]. He has written bravely and frankly to set the record straight and this lengthy essay is well worth the read.
The Truth About the Homosxl Rights Movement
Ronald G. Lee
There was a "gay" bookstore called Lobo's in Austin, Texas, when I was living there. The layout was interesting. Looking inside from the street all you saw were books - like any other bookstore. It all looked so innocuous and disarmingly bourgeois. But if you went inside to browse, before long you noticed another section, behind the books, a section not visible from the street. The pornography section. Hundreds and hundreds of videos involving men catering to every conceivable sxl taste or fantasy. And you would notice something else too. All the customers were in the back, rooting through the videos. As far as I know, I am the only person who ever actually purchased a book. The books were, in every sense of the word, a front.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Remember Tyndale ...
Today is the day many in the Church remember the life and work of William Tyndale. He died on this day in 1536.
A lot has been made of the King James Version of the Bible this year, but if you're like me, you haven't heard or thought much about this dear saint. Below are a few of the phrases we take for granted, that originated with him:
Jehovah (from a transliterated Hebrew construction in the Old Testament; composed from the Tetragrammaton YHWH.
Passover (as the name for the Jewish holiday, Pesach or Pesah)
scapegoat (the goat that bears the sins and iniquities of the people in Leviticus, Chapter 16)
A lot has been made of the King James Version of the Bible this year, but if you're like me, you haven't heard or thought much about this dear saint. Below are a few of the phrases we take for granted, that originated with him:
Jehovah (from a transliterated Hebrew construction in the Old Testament; composed from the Tetragrammaton YHWH.
Passover (as the name for the Jewish holiday, Pesach or Pesah)
scapegoat (the goat that bears the sins and iniquities of the people in Leviticus, Chapter 16)
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Sporadic Mycophilia: Golden Chanties ...
Today I found my first wild golden chanterelles - one of the most precious finds for any mycophage [top 3 choice edible on any list] because of their taste and because they have never been successfully cultivated by commercial farmers. They were beautiful, if a little over-ripe. I found them circling the ground near a large, mature oak in some woods almost within sight of the side door to my office. They smell strongly of dried apricots - not even a trace of mushroom or fungal aroma ... simply wonderful. Bright, buttery yellow gold, they stood out from the forest floor, that is only just starting to clutter with the bright colors of fall leaves. You can see from the picture their deep ridges/wrinkles [NOT gills & NOT growing out of dead wood/tree base and NOT in a true cluster]. They sliced solid with a white center down the stalk. We sauteed them with some pineapple, honey, salt, general seasoning spice mix, and of course, lots of butter - then served with pasta.
It vividly reminded me of a Leithart passage a friend shared with me recently. He notes how Moses recounts the construction of the tabernacle to parallel the 7 days of creation in Genesis 1. “Day 3: Table of showbread on north side outside the veil, with bread arranged [Ex 40:22-23]” corresponds to Day 3 of the creation week: “Golden land and food”.
It vividly reminded me of a Leithart passage a friend shared with me recently. He notes how Moses recounts the construction of the tabernacle to parallel the 7 days of creation in Genesis 1. “Day 3: Table of showbread on north side outside the veil, with bread arranged [Ex 40:22-23]” corresponds to Day 3 of the creation week: “Golden land and food”.
Labels:
apologetics,
food,
mushrooms,
quotes,
the gospel,
theology
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Genesis Debate, part 1
Here is an old online debate I had with a dear friend on our reading of Genesis 1-11. Enjoy!
HIS THESIS: Science proves that the earth is billions of years old and this is compatible with the teachings of early Genesis.
MY THESIS: The earth is only thousands of years old and any honest reading of Genesis demands this view.
ME: A - your position can be summed up in w/ the words: square peg; round hole; hammer not included.
Here’s a big clue: something interesting to note - Unbelieving scholarship uniformely confirms … without blinking … the simple reading - without the pressure of having to actually make the account seem believable, … like the insecure, affection-starved girl mistaking lust for love, we confuse honest exegesis for sophisticated interpretations.
Can you give me the one or two strongest reasons WITHIN THE TEXT ITSELF for a “loose interpretation”?
HIM: B! Good to hear from you! I remember talking about this before with you : D It seems you haven't changed your mind on the age of the earth, but you have changed your mind on baptism! Your wisdom is now suspect... HAHAHA (kidding) : D"
No doubt similar arguments were made during Galileo's time...
Labels:
apologetics,
evolution,
hermeneutics,
scientism,
theology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





